« Supreme Court rules on CO2 | Main | Hurricane blows off the public's right to know »

Blame owner, not the dog

A couple of residents want to have pit bull dogs banished from Cedar City.

One of them had a child who was severely injured by an animal during an attack last fall.

Sorry, this one doesn't fly.

I love children and believe they should always be well-protected. They should be kept from all sources of harm.

But, I also love animals and understand that it is not the animal, it is the animal's owner who is responsible for a pet's behavior.

What would these people do with the number of pit bulls and other supposedly nasty pets people have in Cedar City, kill them?

I do have a couple of questions for the mother of the child injured.

How did your 4-year-old daughter encounter this dog? Was she alone? Did she go into a neighbor's yard? Was the dog loose? Was the dog aggressive or responding to the child?

Pit bulls are very sweet, loving animals. Their only aim in life is to please their masters. It is up to the dog's master as to how the animal turns out. If it is trained to be mean, it will be mean. If it is trained to be gentle, it will be gentle. But, even gentle dogs can nip or injure a child if provoked or injured.

The Cedar City Council would be making a huge mistake if it bans pit bulls or any other type of animal from the city.

Hold the owner responsible, but not the animal.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.southernutahblog.com/cgi-bin/mt/mtb.cgi/173

0 Comments

Post a comment

(Your comment will not appear immediately, it must first be approved by a moderator. Your comment will be rejected if it contains profanity or inappropriate material. All posted comments are unedited.)

Powered by Movable Type 3.2

Contact Us | Subscribe | Place an ad
Copyright ©2006 The Spectrum. All rights reserved.
Users of this site agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy (Terms updated 7/20/05)

USATODAY.com     USAWEEKEND.COM     Gannett Foundation     Gannett.com