Bunker busters, nuclear overkill
Overkill, that's all it is.
The idea of creating new-generation mini-nukes to burrow deeply into the ground to strike hardened targets is ludicrous.
It takes no imagination at all to understand what the detonation of even a small nuclear device would do to a civilian population.
There's the initial explosion, followed by fallout climbing into the atmosphere and, of course, the residual contamination of the target site. And, of course, the inevitable retaliation.
Of course, the four horsemen of the apocalypse -- Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rice -- don't seem to care. Or, worse, they don't relate the death of a civilian population on a foreign shore as human.
There's growing evidence to what the Muslim world has feared all along, that this war on terror is nothing more than a thinly disguised recreation of The Crusades. The pope said as much recently during a speech in Germany, why would we expect other proponents from the Christian right to think otherwise? And, of course, that would include such solid humanitarians as our administration and the sheep that mindlessly follow them.
I always thought the true Christian path led to peace.

RSS feed
Comments
Matthew 5:9
Posted by: Dwayne | September 17, 2006 04:11 AM
Well, if Israel had bunker busters, their recent war with Lebanon would have ended within hours and Hezbollah might be decimated. Which they certainly deserved.
I'm for bunker busters. The only way to deter the types of terrorists who exist today is to annilihate them.
Posted by: Arlene Ball | September 17, 2006 08:09 AM